The Assembly Hall and Museum at Chandigarh
The following is the first in a series of two texts that reproduce email correspondence between Niall Hobhouse and José Oubrerie. Here, Oubrerie provides a commentary on two drawings now in the Drawing Matter collection, both made while he was working in Le Corbusier’s atelier. The correspondence has been lightly edited but otherwise left in the original voices.
18 July 2020
Dear Professor Oubrerie,
I wanted to send you images of two Chandigarh drawings that we have assembled here; this is in case you can throw any particular light on them, in terms of authorship, function or technique.
I would be very grateful for any thoughts you might have, on either of them.
With best wishes, and with thanks again – and in advance.
18 July 2020
Thanks for contacting me, you have a few of Le Corbusier drawing’s shown and I was pleasantly surprised that you had met my long-time friend Jullian [Guillermo Jullian de la Fuente] (we worked together from 1958 all the way long to 1965 at the atelier and a little after until 1966 and remained connected until his death) and that you have now these 12 pages of a sketchbook about the Governor Palace that probably Le Corbusier gave him when he asked him to develop the project designated to replace the Governor’s Palace (Eugenio Tobito worked on this project) which had been rejected by the Indian Government I think being too reminiscent of the image of government as former British Vice-King centralised power, as I heard it from some Indian Architects. Curiously they were looking to build it now… for its architectural value.
I have looked at the two drawings that you sent to me:
The first is a section of the Main Meeting Room in the Assembly Building. It is a print as I see it from the photograph. It concerns the acoustics of the room which, being a hyperboloid of revolution, geometrically, is not very good for acoustics… repetitive regular reflexion of the sound, echos, etc… and the reinforced concrete material is not very helpful too…
If you know the building you can see the adopted solution in the photos of the interiors of the Assembly Chamber; absorbing ‘Clouds’ on all the periphery. You have at the bottom of your drawing calculations concerning the definition of percentages of absorbing surface necessary to obtain satisfactory Acoustics. Very probably the original drawing could be from the hand of Iannis Xenakis who was the atelier designer responsible for the project.
The building was built between 1951 and 1962 but this drawing was probably from 1957, I suppose, it refers to information given by Mr Tak on 29/11/57, he was the Philips Acoustical engineer. This reinforces my conviction that it is from Xenakis as beginning of August. Le Corbusier was pressuring Xenakis to send him the drawings of the ‘Bouchon’ (the ‘cork’), i.e. the precise design of all the closure of the top of the paraboloid, a complex set of elements designed in relationship to the movements of the sun in Chandigarh which Xenakis had proposed and calculated.
At the end of August ‘58: Xenakis, Maisonnier and Tobito – the 3 actual collaborators of L-C – were fired … we were in the studio on 1 September, I think…
I have a sample of Xenakis’s handwriting, and I am pretty sure that your drawings are from his hand, but you would have to ask to a serious graphologue for confirmation after the original drawing.
The second drawing is also a print (difficult for me to know from the photo but I think that it has been coloured after printing which otherwise would have turned the red to a more brownish tone). It is showing the dimensioning adopted for the section of beams and slabs of concrete, the nature of the facade walls etc… of the Chandigarh Museum. This drawing was made in Chandigarh, probably in Pierre Jeanneret’s Office where he was the Site Architect for Le Corbusier. The Indian Government was paying in rupees, so this was making possible to spend the money which was sufficient in India and L-C asked to Pierre, his cousin, to run the things there when they started construction.
The first stages of conception and preliminary drawings were made in Paris and L-C would take them to India where he was going one or two times a year for one month each. The drawings in this case Corbusier put me in charge of designing the original project of the Museum in Paris and took the drawings with him to India. This explain also that while in India they were not drawing as usual for them in the inch/foot system but here all the dimensions are in metric, mostly according to the Modulor, and that all the texts are bilingual, French and English.
It is a typical section showing the main Museum structure and its connection with the annexe constructions lower than the main part.
I hope that these explanations will help you, so you can say for the Assembly building: Study of Acoustics, probably 1957 or beginning 1958. Print of a drawing probably by Iannis Xenakis; and for the other one: Chandigarh Museum, structural studies attributed to Pierre Jeanneret office, print and colour pencil I designed the project in 1964 or 65 I have to check so this drawing might be at the same date the last trip of L-C may have been Fall 64… I will check and let you know this weekend at the latest Monday…
Bravo for your collection, great to have this interest in reinforcing the importance of Architecture as primarily an Art… I remain at your disposal for any other question and will send you what I find about dates etc…
Regards… Jose Oubrerie
3 August 2020
Thank you for looking so hard, and any detailed comments that develop from your studies will be greedily consumed at this end; what you have said is fascinating already.
Incidentally, we looked carefully with a conservator at the Museum and the Assembly sheets and are as certain as we can be that both of these are drawings. In any case, we would be fascinated to understand more of working practices in Chandigarh, and particularly communication between Paris and the site office.
Niall, very best
3 August 2020
Don’t apologise what you said is good news, the only test is light which can confirm what you think. The problem today is that we don’t use anymore the same type of machines and paper so few people know about it unless they are an old architect like myself.
I am sure that Doshi’s work with L-C was different from the way we were working because this was always transforming, in fact a research as much as the projects themselves and you can follow this evolution over the succession of projects of L-C during his life…
I cannot get back to you before this Tuesday but I will be sending you by mail things by the end of the day…Thanks for your patience, Amicalement…Jose O